Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!killer!wnp
From: wnp@killer.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Printer Owner Confused
Message-ID: <2046@killer.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Nov-87 15:19:04 EST
Article-I.D.: killer.2046
Posted: Mon Nov  9 15:19:04 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Nov-87 03:44:12 EST
References: <2151@encore.UUCP>
Reply-To: wnp@killer.UUCP (Wolf Paul)
Distribution: na
Organization: The Unix(tm) Connection BBS, Dallas, Tx
Lines: 18
Keywords: Toshiba, NEC, IgiveUP!

In article <2151@encore.UUCP> chan@encore.UUCP (Jerry Chan) writes:
>!!! HELP !!!
> (some stuff deleted)
>Does anybody have any clues?  The confusing thing is that NEC insists that
>the board works, but the setup doesn't work w/the NEC but works with spare
>Mono board / printer port.  NEC seemed to suspect the cable, but I checked
>the pinout on the AT side and they correspond to the pinout on the centronix
>side (after the operation :-);  still no change.
>
>I am stumped...  help, please?  Pretty please ???

How about taking your computer & printer to the NEC dealer, and ask them to
DEMONSTRATE that it works - then demonstrate that it works with your spare
printer port. I'm afraid I don't always trust assurances that something was
checked out and works. 

Wolf Paul
ihnp4!killer!wnp