Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!etn-rad!jru From: jru@etn-rad.UUCP (John Unekis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 16bit 386 chips! Message-ID: <307@etn-rad.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Nov-87 13:49:23 EST Article-I.D.: etn-rad.307 Posted: Tue Nov 17 13:49:23 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 20-Nov-87 03:30:35 EST References: <5011@oberon.USC.EDU> <2139@lsuc.UUCP> <752@neoucom.UUCP> Reply-To: jru@etn-rad.UUCP (John Unekis) Organization: Eaton Inc. IMSD, Westlake Village, CA Lines: 24 Keywords: 386 Xref: mnetor comp.sys.ibm.pc:10253 comp.sys.intel:398 In article <752@neoucom.UUCP> wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew) writes: > >The early batches of '386 CPUs from Intel a\had about a 10% failure >rate on 32 bit multiplies. It is my understanding that the faliure >was caused by a bug in the manufacturing quality control testing >procedure.-- NOT a flaw in the architecture of the chip. ... Nice try, but I dont think this is accurate. I beleive that the flaw was in the chip design. The gates in the multiply ALU were packed too closely together, and a zero bit surrounded by ones would be turned into a one by the induced charge from the surrounding cells. The design flaw was not found before the chips were sold due to a lack in intels quality control procedure- apparently no one in their QC department thought of testing the ALU with alternating bit patterns. A defective chip cannot be caused by poor QC procedures. What intel could have done, had their QC department been a little quicker on the draw, would have been to remove the chips that actually failed from the production stream. They could have sold potentially defective chips that didnt actually fail, and no one would have noticed while they fixed their design internnaly. But look at it from intels point of view, Western Electric had the WE32000, National had the 32032, motorola had the 68020, all 32-bit processors. All intel had was the 16-bit lineup . They just had to get something out to market to catch up with the competition. Under pressure like that it is understandable that mistakes might occur.