Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MSC5.0 benchmarks
Message-ID: <7954@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Nov-87 08:39:01 EST
Article-I.D.: steinmet.7954
Posted: Tue Nov 24 08:39:01 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Nov-87 01:08:24 EST
References: <274@krebs.acc.virginia.edu>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 15

In article <274@krebs.acc.virginia.edu> wrp@krebs.acc.virginia.edu (Wm Pearson) writes:
|	So Turbo'C' still has the edge, because of compilation time
|and cost.  I like to distribute source code that other people can read
|and modify, with Turbo'C' they can compile it for <$70.00.  (It also
|requires a lot less disk space). But MSC
|does contain a graphics library.  Unfortunately the MSC graphics library
|appears to not support the hercules graphics cards.

QuickC and TurboC have the same list price $99 (at least quoted in the
ad in front of me). I doubt that the discount prices vary much either. I
like QuickC because of the debugger and graphics.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me