Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!cm450s02
From: cm450s02@uhccux.UUCP (jeff t. segawa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: BYTE MAG (We don't even rate...)
Message-ID: <1053@uhccux.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Nov-87 22:41:42 EST
Article-I.D.: uhccux.1053
Posted: Mon Nov  2 22:41:42 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Nov-87 22:18:04 EST
References: <12346169899024@G.BBN.COM> <7528@dartvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: cm450s02@uhccux.UUCP (jeff t. segawa)
Organization: U. of Hawaii, Manoa (Honolulu)
Lines: 13

>In article <12346169899024@G.BBN.COM>, DREDICK@G.BBN.COM (Donald Redick) writes:
But of late, (as if you haven't noticed) it has turned into
a mouthpiece for the IBM Clan..
(rest of article edited out...)

That may be true of Byte, but have you seen PC Magazine lately? I picked up
the November 24 issue, which has a PS/2 model 80 / Mac II comparision, which
despite a few remarks about the "fruit computer" is well written, and    
surprisingly, a few ads for Mac products have been appearing in these
pages! I agreed with most of the comments made in the article, particularly
the comparisons between the fine IBM "enhanced" keyboard, and the so-so
standard Apple keyboard. (or course we all know that REAL Mac users opt for
the expanded model, which is one of the best options around for the SE and II.)