Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!cartan!wheatena!lippin
From: lippin@wheatena (The Apathist)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Compiler efficiency
Message-ID: <1380@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Wed, 4-Nov-87 18:02:43 EST
Article-I.D.: cartan.1380
Posted: Wed Nov  4 18:02:43 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 16:41:58 EST
References: <3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1881@dasys1.UUCP> <3105@husc6.UUCP>
Sender: nobody@cartan.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: lippin@wheatena.UUCP (Tom Lippincott, ..ucbvax!bosco!lippin)
Organization: UC Berkeley Math Department
Lines: 17

Recently singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel) said:
>
>I agree that it would be desirable to link on a procedure-by-procedure
>basis, but there are tradeoffs: project files will get bigger, and
>build times will get slower.

While I chose Lightspeed mostly for it's compile-link-and-run speed,
the build time it uses doesn't matter to me significantly.  At the
most, I use "Build Application" about twice a month.  Doing it that
often, I wouldn't mind if it had to go back and recompile everything,
and take half an hour, if it would give me a well-optimized product.

						--Tom Lippincott
						..ucbvax!bosco!lippin

    "There is no place I know like the land of pure imagination..."
						--W. Wonka