Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!nsc!csi!jwhitnel
From: jwhitnel@csi.UUCP (Jerry Whitnell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Compiler efficiency
Message-ID: <1278@csib.csi.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 12:18:51 EST
Article-I.D.: csib.1278
Posted: Thu Nov  5 12:18:51 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 11:38:40 EST
References: <3987@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1881@dasys1.UUCP> <3105@husc6.UUCP> <1380@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: jwhitnel@csib.UUCP (Jerry Whitnell)
Organization: Communications Solutions Inc., San Jose, Ca
Lines: 19

In article <1380@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> lippin@wheatena.UUCP (Tom Lippincott, ..ucbvax!bosco!lippin) writes:
>While I chose Lightspeed mostly for it's compile-link-and-run speed,
>the build time it uses doesn't matter to me significantly.  At the
>most, I use "Build Application" about twice a month.  Doing it that
>often, I wouldn't mind if it had to go back and recompile everything,
>and take half an hour, if it would give me a well-optimized product.

No, No, don't change it!!! :-)  I have a project I'm working on that
I can't run from the compiler, so I have to build an application
every time (don't ask why).  Make optimization an option so that we have
to wait for the application to be rebuilt only if we want to.

>
>						--Tom Lippincott


Jerry Whitnell				Lizzi Borden took an axe
Communication Solutions, Inc.		And plunged it deep into the VAX;
					Don't you envy people who
					Do all the things You want to do?