Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!uwmacc!uwmcsd1!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!hammen
From: hammen@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Robert Joseph Hammen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Possible LSC improvements
Message-ID: <3431@uwmcsd1.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Nov-87 15:46:24 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmcsd1.3431
Posted: Mon Nov  9 15:46:24 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Nov-87 06:49:31 EST
References: <6523@prls.UUCP> <9370001@hpfclp.HP.COM>
Sender: daemon@uwmcsd1.UUCP
Reply-To: hammen@csd4.milw.wisc.edu.UUCP (Robert Hammen)
Organization: Computer Applications, Inc.
Lines: 22

In article <6656@apple.UUCP> lsr@apple.UUCP (Larry Rosenstein) writes:
>In article <3119@husc6.UUCP> stew@endor.UUCP (Stew Rubenstein) writes:
>>
>>Are you certain of this?  I seem to remember noticing that PTCH 105 was
>>NOT in system 4.2, although it is in 4.1.
>
>Right you are.  (I did say that I hadn't checked System 4.2 before making my
>comment.)  Also, the patch for the Mac XL is not in System 4.1, but is in
>System 3.2.
>
>This means developers would have to ship System 4.1 if they wanted to
>support 512K machines with old ROMs as well as other machines.

This means that developers would have to ship System 4.0 if they wanted to
support Lisas under MacWorks. System 4.0 does work fine on a Lisa, especially
with the HFS upgrade now available from Sun Systems Remarketing.

>Larry Rosenstein


Robert Hammen	Computer Applications, Inc.
hammen@csd4.milw.wisc.edu	Delphi: HAMMEN		GEnie: R.Hammen