Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MultiFinder RAMDisks
Message-ID: <3150@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Nov-87 08:48:32 EST
Article-I.D.: husc6.3150
Posted: Tue Nov 10 08:48:32 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Nov-87 07:22:46 EST
References: <1927@unc.cs.unc.edu> <6664@apple.UUCP> <5104@oberon.USC.EDU>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel)
Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA
Lines: 33

In article <5104@oberon.USC.EDU> kurtzman@pollux.usc.edu (Stephen Kurtzman) writes:
>In article <6664@apple.UUCP>, keith@apple.UUCP (Keith Rollin) writes:
>> In article <1927@unc.cs.unc.edu> steele@unc.UUCP (Oliver Steele) writes:
>> >Are there any RAMDisks that run under MultiFinder (assuming you have the
>> 
>> I'm sorry, but this just cracks me up. For a long time, people were ragging
>> on Apple that MultiFinder used up too much memory and was practically useless


***FLAME ON***

	This is too much. One person asks a simple question: "Are there
any RAMDisks that run under MultiFinder?" Instead of a straight answer, 
all that I've seen is a bunch of stupid cracks, and peripheral information,
and absolutely *nothing* that helps to answer the original question! 

	Does *someone* know the answer? I too am rather interested to
know if there are any RAM disks that work with System 4.1 (or later) and
MultiFinder.

***FLAME OFF***

		--Rich




**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer    *
* Customer Support  | singer@endor.harvard.edu			    *
* Symantec, THINK Technologies Division.  (No snappy quote)         *