Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!ihlpf!straka
From: straka@ihlpf.ATT.COM (Straka)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: SCREENS HURT EYES (Mac SE, Plus)
Message-ID: <2794@ihlpf.ATT.COM>
Date: Mon, 16-Nov-87 15:01:31 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpf.2794
Posted: Mon Nov 16 15:01:31 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Nov-87 07:20:59 EST
References: <1767@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <993@ski.UUCP> <2923@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <4555@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Reply-To: straka@ihlpf.UUCP (55223-Straka,R.J.)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 23
Keywords: screens, screen, hurt, eyes, Clinton Taiwan Corp.

In article <4555@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> newton@cit-vax.UUCP (Mike Newton) writes:
>the enclosed copy is yet another identical copy of the same message.
>
>Why?  Is the poster a lawyer ?  I think an explanation is in
>order.
>???In article <2923@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> dyckman@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Howard L. Dyckman) writes:
>???>My eyes have been hurt by some recent Macintosh screens (SE, Plus).
>???>Symptoms include sensitivity to light, dryness, grittiness under
>???>the eyelids, soreness.  A brief exposure produced only soreness.
>???>

Yes, this old posting posting keeps on coming back!
But instead of reposting a copy of the original in all of its gory detail, a
posting of the 'diff' would have been more appropriate, perhaps.

Summary?   Both are guilty!

PS: I apologize for chewing up even more bandwidth.  But, come on, somebody
has to take a sane look at it!
-- 
Rich Straka     ihnp4!ihlpf!straka

Advice for the day: "MSDOS - just say no."