Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!yale!mfci!news
From: news@mfci.UUCP (Usenet)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Unix Desktop Publishing vs. Mac [was Re: Commodore's handling...]
Message-ID: <201@m2.mfci.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Nov-87 12:21:54 EST
Article-I.D.: m2.201
Posted: Wed Nov 18 12:21:54 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Nov-87 10:21:59 EST
References: <8711030308.AA01230@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <6613@apple.UUCP> <4120@ccicpg.UUCP> <2133@tekig4.TEK.COM> <216@esquire.UUCP>
Reply-To: ryland@m6.UUCP (Chris Ryland)
Organization: Multiflow Computer Inc., Branford, CT. 06405
Lines: 20
Keywords: troff, psfig, MS Word 3.0
Summary: Mac is even better than Unix tools

In article <216@esquire.UUCP> sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) writes:
> ...
>I, too, believe in using the right tool for the right job, and when it comes
>to individual page layout and graphic design, the Mac is unsurpassed.  But
>when it comes to complicated, multi-page technical documents, where
>relationships between the elements of the document become more important than
>its physical layout (e.g., you want to break the page here if and only if
>a certain table won't fit on the remai