Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!elroy!cit-vax!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Microprocessors
Message-ID: <8711201958.AA29907@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Fri, 20-Nov-87 14:58:33 EST
Article-I.D.: cory.8711201958.AA29907
Posted: Fri Nov 20 14:58:33 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Nov-87 16:16:45 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 12

:use Motorola.  Obviously, IBM thinks Intel is better and Apple thinks Motorola
:is better.  Why don't you ask THEM why???

	No.  IBM is more concerned with compatibility.  Once they made the
decision to go with Intel, that was it.  In fact, they originally intended to
go with the 68000, but at the time Motorola couldn't provide the volume needed.
Smaller companies have more freedom to change because they have a smaller
customer base (and don't deal with as much red tape)

					-Matt