Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!ames!necntc!encore!loverso
From: loverso@encore.UUCP (John LoVerso)
Newsgroups: comp.terminals
Subject: Re: HDS terminals
Message-ID: <2189@encore.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Nov-87 12:01:44 EST
Article-I.D.: encore.2189
Posted: Wed Nov 18 12:01:44 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Nov-87 09:37:53 EST
References: <7@bbking.PRC.Unisys.COM> <316@bvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: loverso@encore.UUCP (John LoVerso)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp, Marlboro, MA
Lines: 16

In article <316@bvax.UUCP> da@bvax.UUCP (Dave Sellers) writes:
> For those who don't have an HDS, some of the best features of the HDS are:
> [lots of good features]
> 
> In summary, I haven't found a terminal that can do what these can at the
> same $$$$ value. I think others on the net will support this.

I agree that HDS makes terminals with great features and at a pretty low
cost.  But, back at my previous job, I didn't buy them.  Not because of
reliability problems, *but* because they could barely do 9600 baud without
flow control!  19200 was effectively flow-controlled back down to an
effect `11000 baud'.  Can anyone with one of HDS's recent terminals
tell me this is no longer a problem?

John Robert LoVerso, Encore Computer Corp
encore!loverso, loverso@multimax.arpa