Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!mtune!rutgers!mcnc!xanth!kyle
From: kyle@xanth.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: GNU security, size
Message-ID: <3186@xanth.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Nov-87 14:32:00 EST
Article-I.D.: xanth.3186
Posted: Wed Nov  4 14:32:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 17:45:29 EST
References: <7399@alice.UUCP> <14059@oddjob.UChicago.EDU>
Lines: 8
Keywords: GNU security, size

In <14059@oddjob.UChicago.EDU>, matt@oddjob.UChicago.EDU (D 1 4 U 2 C) writes:
> It seems to me that a very few people on the net asserted without
> evidence that they expected GNU to have no protection mechanisms,
> and now lots of people believe it!

Particularly absurd are the claims that there will be no memory
protection.  Memory protection in a multi-tasking operating system is
not paranoia, it's common sense.