Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!uwmacc!uwmcsd1!ig!jade!saturn!ucscc.UCSC.EDU!haynes
From: haynes@ucscc.UCSC.EDU.ucsc.edu (99700000)
Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics
Subject: Re: A question (and back to medium wave DX)...
Message-ID: <1154@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 17-Nov-87 00:58:59 EST
Article-I.D.: saturn.1154
Posted: Tue Nov 17 00:58:59 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Nov-87 01:30:14 EST
References: <310@trane.UUCP> <5927@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: usenet@saturn.ucsc.edu
Reply-To: haynes@ucscc.UCSC.EDU (Jim Haynes)
Distribution: na
Organization: California State Home for the Weird
Lines: 18
Xref: mnetor rec.ham-radio:3243 sci.electronics:1759

In article <5927@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> cuccia@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Nick Cuccia) writes:
>In article <310@trane.UUCP> cook@trane.UUCP (Eric Cook) writes:
>>
>>	Would anybody be interested in seeing a group for Shortwave
>>	DX-ing called rec.radio.dx-ing?
>>
>
>Sure, sounds like a thought, but why limit it to Shortwave DXing?
>I'm more partial to, for example, Mediumwave, Longwave, and VHF
>DX.  Count me in.

Well, why limit it to dx?  Is there any interest in a group for
SWL-ing (and MWL-ing and LWL-ing and VHF-ing)?  What would you call
it then?

haynes@ucscc.ucsc.edu
haynes@ucscc.bitnet
..--\
289hartharthlang