Xref: utzoo alt.flame:1118 talk.religion.newage:1329 talk.origins:922 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!ames!ll-xn!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!daemon From: daemon@uwmcsd1.UUCP (The devil himself) Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.religion.newage,talk.origins Subject: Re: Theological Debates Message-ID: <4032@uwmcsd1.UUCP> Date: 31 Dec 87 21:43:35 GMT Organization: U of Wi-Milwaukee, Computing Services Div Lines: 48 Sender Followup-To: The Useless Prattering Concerning Christmas Celebrations Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Keywords: Ignorance of History, Pagan Festivals, Freedom of Religion From: markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins) Path: csd4.milw.wisc.edu!markh This silly debate about Christmas is not only stupid, but unnecessary. Simply put, both sides are wrong as they argue from the same false premise (irony of all ! that they should both agree on what makes them wrong). Christmas may SEEM like a Christian holiday, but it is not. Nor was it originally. The church stole (or borrowed) it around 8 or 9 hundred years after Christ. Every European culture has had a celebration at this time of year. When you live at 50 degrees latitude, you have reason to celebrate the turning of the the 21st. In order to convert the pagans of Europe, the Church found it necessary to schedule the commemoration of Christ's birth and death so as to coincide with Winter and Spring Fests, else the pagans would've never converted as they would have never sat still for the removal of their cherished holidays. The fact is that Christ was born sometime around July. In fact, because of its pagan origins, Christmas was BANNED in England during the time of Puritan rule. For similar reasons, Christmas wasn't even recognized as a holiday in this country until the late 1830's. To put it simply, fundamentalists true to their ideology would ban Christmas! You need not be Christan to celebrate this holiday. Christmas imposes no religion on anyone, EXCEPT when people rant and rave about the so-called true meaning of Christmas. The True "True Meaning" of Christmas is to celebrate the turning of the seasons. As for what the Church does with its holidays, render onto Christ those things that are Christ's, no one else is compelled to pay tribute. In any case, you needn't be Christian to respect what Christ represents. Even the Jews recognize Christ, though only as the prophet named Yshua. In America, we observe freedom of religious practice (insofar as such practice is consistent with what we believe to be Universal Human Rights). There are two ways to consider that freedom: restrictively or liberally. Restrictivelly means we restrict all religious practice from the public domain. This will, however, lead to the loss of spirituality amongst the people as a whole. Liberally means that we allow all religious practices in the public domain. If this means that every day is to become a holiday for some religion, then so be it... all the better for those who enjoy living. The wisdom inherent in this freedom was to encourage the expression of religion without imposing the beliefs of anyone onto anyone else. What it allows for is an intermixing from which the best of all possible worlds can be taken. This process has always been what gave America its strength throughout its heritage of several thousand years of intermixing of peoples from all parts of the old world (and no, nobody ever "discovered" America, but that's another story...)