Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:12664 alt.flame:1217 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!killer!jdp From: jdp@killer.UUCP (Jim Pritchett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,alt.flame Subject: Re: Virus spread due to piracy? Huh? Summary: More Flames ahead (short) Sorry to waste net.bandwidth, but this time they went too far. Message-ID: <2731@killer.UUCP> Date: 9 Jan 88 04:43:57 GMT References: <2301@crash.cts.com> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 51 In article <2301@crash.cts.com>, haitex@pnet01.cts.com (Wade Bickel) writes: > langz@athena.mit.edu (Lang Zerner) writes: > > A bunch of garbage relating the Virus/Pirating issue with AIDS. > > Get it clear. A "Homosexual" has done nothing WRONG to get infected. [more similar stuff deleted] > > > Wade. > > UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!haitex > ARPA: crash!pnet01!haitex@nosc.mil > INET: haitex@pnet01.CTS.COM No, you get it clear! A Homosexual has definitely done something WRONG to get infected with AIDS. He committed unnatural, deviant acts (AIDS major method of transmission) which have been expressly prohibited by God. So, yes he did do something WRONG! Please note that the other methods of transmission (contaminated needles, blood transfusions, and heterosexual contact, etc.) are much rarer and not relevant to this discussion. (Because the original statement postulated a homosexual that acquired AIDS. No, I dont want to discuss the VERY remote possibility that he never committed the acts and acquired it by another route.) We are talking about a very specific case here. Jim Pritchett PS. I am sorry to waste the net bandwidth with this, but some outrageous statements should NOT be allowed to pass unremarked. I will try to resist replying to any further responses here on this subject since I know that you all hate these side discussions in comp.sys.amiga. PLEASE, NO MORE about AIDS here. He (and a few others) foisted off his opinions on us here, and I responded with mine. We DONT need any further discussion of this in the amiga area. I dont like his opinion, he doesnt like mine. Neither is likely to be changed by filling comp.sys.amiga with more flames.