Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!enea!kuling!irf
From: irf@kuling.UUCP (Stellan Bergman)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Why is SPARC so slow?
Message-ID: <589@kuling.UUCP>
Date: 18 Dec 87 06:42:18 GMT
References: <1078@quacky.UUCP> <8809@sgi.SGI.COM> <1941@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <140@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> <1131@mips.UUCP>
Reply-To: irf@kuling.UUCP (Stellan Bergman)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University, Sweden
Lines: 6
Keywords: RISC, R2000, SPARC


How does the SPARC architecture differ from HPs HPA/RISC.  The latter has
been around for quite some while now.  I am curious to know since we plan
to move to something faster soon.

Bo Thide', Swedish Institute of Space Physics.  UUCP: ...enea!kuling!irfu!bt