Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cfa!ward From: ward@cfa.harvard.EDU (Steve Ward) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Impossible 40MHz R2000 ?? Message-ID: <844@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> Date: 23 Dec 87 19:01:32 GMT References: <8252@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> <8280@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Organization: Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. for Astrophysics Lines: 49 Keywords: fast faster fastest micro east of the GaAs :-) Summary: non-classified DARPA-sponsored research GE RISC Microprocessor > > The RPM40 chip..... > > > After ISSCC I hope I can talk design : this was a non-classified > DARPA project, and GE is NOT in the computer business. Maybe I'll > be allowed to publish. I hope so : I think we did some great work ! > > -- > Dennis O'Connor oconnor@sungoddess.steinmetz.UUCP ?? > ARPA: OCONNORDM@ge-crd.arpa > "If I have an "s" in my name, am I a PHIL-OSS-IF-FER?" I believe that all non-classified federal research must be made available to U.S. Citizens. The Freedom of Information Act can be used to obtain such information if it is not otherwise forthcoming. DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS! Clearly the researcher(s) have rights to privacy and confidentiality during the research, so nobody can or should be able to force premature disclosures. However, a research contract with DARPA will call for research results in the form of reports, findings, papers, or whatever to be reported to DARPA according to the contract timetable, which might even be only upon completion/termination of the research grant/contract. All such non-classified documents and research materials may be requested by anyone. If the research is classified then only DOD contractors with the need to know and industrial and foreign spies :-) will gain access. Of course, one can always appeal the DOD classification, as well. All of this is stated here to pose a question: Dennis O'Connor seemed to have doubt as to what he could make public in the long term about his work. It seems to me that if his work is sponsored by a non-classified DARPA grant or research contract, that his work MUST be made public as it is reported to DARPA, meaning that at the very least, the documents and other information he gives to DARPA should be publically available in roughly the timeframe in which DARPA receives such information. Again, preliminary information and general communications with DARPA are not what I am talking about, but only final results and findings. Now for my parachute: We do a lot of federally-sponsored research here, but almost always with NASA. Our work is also of a non-classified nature. Our scientists live to publish, so the only secrecy is prior to publishing, then all the beans are publically spilled. There certainly may be more to this situation than meets my eye. I am not an expert on federally-sponsored research legalities. Hopefully when the time is right, all technical information regarding the 40MIPS/MHZ beastie will be revealed.