Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Address of Array
Message-ID: <6867@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 18 Dec 87 22:31:17 GMT
References: <126@citcom.UUCP> <...@...UUCP> <3137@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <569@ndsuvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 5

In article <569@ndsuvax.UUCP> ncbauers@ndsuvax.UUCP (Michael Bauers) writes:
>Would someone care to comment why &a does not behave like &x does? 

In ANSI C, it does!  In some older C compilers, &a was illegal, and in
others &a was treated like plain a (i.e. as &a[0]).