Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!houdi!marty1
From: marty1@houdi.UUCP (M.BRILLIANT)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Re: `noalias' vs `register'
Message-ID: <1450@houdi.UUCP>
Date: 17 Dec 87 00:41:25 GMT
References: <9817@mimsy.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel
Lines: 17

In article <9817@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
> (Just a correction!... more typos)
>>... `int register *p'
> 
> I meant to type `int *register p'.  (Arrh.  That makes three errors
> in three news articles within two days!  I need to work on my editing.)

Maybe C should have less abstruse type declarations.  How about:
	type (pointer to register int) p;
vs.
	type (register pointer to int) p;
Wouldn't errors in such a format be harder to make and easier to find?
Incidentally, I also find it easier to understand.

M. B. Brilliant					Marty
AT&T-BL HO 3D-520	(201)-949-1858
Holmdel, NJ 07733	ihnp4!houdi!marty1