Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!ihlpa!dhp From: dhp@ihlpa.ATT.COM (Douglas H. Price) Newsgroups: comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Forecasts '87 and beyond Message-ID: <6678@ihlpa.ATT.COM> Date: 24 Dec 87 18:53:05 GMT References: <2234@dasys1.UUCP> <36846@sun.uucp> <1596@ttidca.TTI.COM> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 68 Keywords: from "The Futurist" Summary: planes ain't cheap > >In article <2234@dasys1.UUCP>, patth@dasys1.UUCP (Patt Haring) writes: > >> From "Outlook '87 and beyond" ... > >> > >> * An airplane in every garage may soon be possible. > >> Lightweight materials such as plastics and aluminum > >> can reduce the cost of manufacturing, making > >> possible affordable, fuel-efficient "personal > >> planes." --WT&F/Technology, Jan/Feb '86 I wish it were true that personal aircraft would get significantly cheaper... Unfortunately, the cost of aircraft is dominated by a number of relatively inflexible critera today: 1. Certification. It costs 1-2 million dollars to certify a new airplane design today; A LOT MORE if it is to be used for air carrier type operations. Thats why most small airplanes flying today are flying on certificates granted in the late 40s and early 50s. It also means that aircraft are not built using "labor-saving" techniques. Even the production techniques for a particular aircraft (wing jigs, parts specs, etc) are part of the certification, and even a simple improvement in production materials, parts or procedures may endanger your type certificate. 2. Liability insurance. The cost of a new Cessna 172 in 1985 (single engine, four seat Chevy-of-the-skies) was about 85,000 dollars. Despite a proven safety record (as far as manufacturer's defects are concerned) it cost $25K for Cessna's liability insurance **PER HULL**. Last year, the insurance carriers announced that the cost of liability insurance for small aircraft would be DOUBLED. This raised the consumer cost of a simple 172 to over $120K That's why Cessna has suspended production of their basic aircraft and trainers. This part of the bill is the only one amenable to a "quick fix." Such changes have been considered in Congress for the last couple of years. 3. Aviation hardware. It costs $10K for the radio stack, $12K for the engine (including the engine manufacturer's liability insurance). Airplanes are not like cars, where if you don't like the sound of the engine you can just pull over to the side of the road. On the other hand, just stamping the word "aviation" on a piece of equipment means you can double or triple the price. As has been pointed out in rec.aviation, the electrical alternator and regulators in some aircraft today are normal GM auto parts. But, because the have been "certified", they cost four times as much as the part at the local car parts dealer. And, you can't just substitute in the auto parts. The FAA will revoke the flight-worthiness certificate of the aircraft if they find out. On the other hand, some of the specialty parts, such as aviation radios have their development and certification costs amortized across a relatively small production run (in the 10s of thousands). We as consumers, are used to items that have their production costs amortized across a production run of millions. 4. The remainder of the dealer cost is the "actual" cost of building the hull. If we are talking about a "new" airplane (new type certificate) then we must amortize the cost of item 1 (plus interest) across the production run of the airplane. If we are talking about a run of 10,000 airplanes in 10 years (not an unreasonable number) this amounts to a $150-500 bill per airplane. In conclusion, I, as a pilot, would LOVE to have a new $30,000 four seat production airplane I could buy like a car, but I don't expect I will see it soon, if ever. The continuing need to improve safety, and the litiguous nature of our culture (read product liability suit) will prevent it. -- Douglas H. Price Analysts International Corp. @ AT&T Bell Laboratories ..!ihnp4!ihlpa!dhp