Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!cosell@WILMA.BBN.COM
From: cosell@WILMA.BBN.COM (Bernie Cosell)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re:  Official newsgroup proposal: comp.sources.games.bugs
Message-ID: <10933@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: 21 Dec 87 16:12:38 GMT
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 15

I'm registering my vote properly, but I wanted to make a public comment:

I don't like think suggestion.  There are a BUNCH of "sources"
groups (comp.sources, comp.sources.misc, comp.sources.amiga, etc).  I was
under the impression that comp.sources.bugs was the common bug channel
for them ALL.  While I understand that "games" are a sensitive matter
at some sites, I am unpersuaded by Joe's arguments that that ONEs bugs
feed should be separated from all of the others.  I think that either
we should move to have EVERY sources group have its own .bugs and .d
feeds (which I think would be just fine), or we should leave things as
they are.
   __
  /  )                              Bernie Cosell
 /--<  _  __  __   o _              BBN Labs, Cambridge, MA 02238
/___/_(<_/ (_/) )_(_(<_             cosell@bbn.com