Xref: utzoo rec.games.hack:1829 comp.sources.bugs:586 comp.sources.d:1594
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ejb
From: ejb@think.COM (Erik Bailey)
Newsgroups: rec.games.hack,comp.sources.bugs,comp.sources.d
Subject: NetHack messages
Message-ID: <14022@think.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 87 15:39:52 GMT
Sender: usenet@think.UUCP
Reply-To: ejb@think.UUCP (Erik Bailey)
Followup-To: rec.games.hack
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 25


The quantum mechanic hits... --More-- The lineater is teleported!

Can we please restrict NetHack discussion to rec.games.hack?
Granted, bugfixes seem to belong in comp.sources.bugs, but when
they start getting followed-up by discussion, it gets outa hand.
Comp.sources.d seems toally inappropriate: we have our own newsgroup
(rec.games.hack), why take another???

I think the majority of rec.games.hack readers (myself included)
are interested in nethack bugs/bugfixes. I doubt the same is true
for comp.sources.d and comp.sources.bugs.

Followups have been (hopefully) directed to rec.games.hack ONLY.

Please don't think I'm flaming -- personally, I'm waiting for the
2.3 official bugfixes and a COMPLETE guide on how to bring it
up bug-free on a PC. But I don't think discussion should span
three newsgroups.

--Erik

Erik Bailey            /    7 Oak Knoll    \        (USENET courtesy of
ihnp4!think!ejb       ( Arlington, MA 02174 )       Thinking Machines Corp.,
ejb@think.com          \   (617)643-0732   /        Cambridge, MA)