Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!cord!nsw From: nsw@cord.UUCP (N Weinstock) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: 19.2k baud modems Message-ID: <503@cord.UUCP> Date: 18 Dec 87 17:46:27 GMT References: <7403@ccicpg.UUCP> Reply-To: nsw@cord.UUCP (59455-N Weinstock) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner Lines: 42 In article <7403@ccicpg.UUCP> harald@ccicpg.UUCP writes: > > Yes, there is such a beast. We just got one, on order for 3 months. >We got it at discount for $700 plus bucks. The discount is applied to uunet >subscribers. Else, pay a hefty $1500. > > Its called a TrailBlazer. Want to know more? > >-- >Work: Computer Consoles Inc. (CCI), Advanced Development Group (ADG) > Irvine, CA (RISCy business! Home of the CCI POWER 6/32) >UUCP: uunet!ccicpg!harald Thought I'd stick my $.02 in. The TrailBlazer is supposed (haven't actually touched one myself) to be a very spiffy unit which will likely become a standard for 19.2Kbps modems. (By the way, BAUD rate is the signalling frequency, not the data rate. The TrailBlazer is a 19.2K bits per second modem, NOT 19.2Kbaud. Sorry to be nitpicky, but I just learned this distinction recently :-) This modem constantly checks the quality of the line, and adjusts data rate accordingly. It has supposedly been clocked at an average of about 14Kbps over random long-distance lines. Pretty impressive. I would guess that if a conditioned line were available, it could probably make 19.2. My understanding is that this thing works by subdividing the 3KHz voice band into a large number of subchannels, and transmitting many bits in "parallel." Well, that's all the hearsay I've heard said. If this posting is a giant glob of misinformation, please correct (or flame) me. I'm very interested in how the TrailBlazer works. -- +_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_+ | | | Neil Weinstock UUCP: ...!codas!cord!nsw | | AT&T Bell Labs, Liberty Corner NET: nsw@cord.att.com | | Warren, NJ (which one? I DON'T KNOW) | | | | DISCLAIMER: My views are entirely my own, I think | | | +_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_+