Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!jack!crash!pnet01!haitex
From: haitex@pnet01.cts.com (Wade Bickel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Recoverable Ram Disks (for Perry S. Kivolowitz).
Message-ID: <2218@crash.cts.com>
Date: 28 Dec 87 11:16:50 GMT
Sender: news@crash.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon, CA
Lines: 30


        Perry,

                Once, several months ago I saw a discussion on the
             comparative speed ratings of vdk: and vd0:.  In those
             ratings, I would hardly call the transfer rates of the
             two programs equal.  vdk: was rated (from my memory) at
             many times the speed of vd0:.   It was supposedly as fast
             as ram:.

                I assume that you are the author of vd0:???

                Both your comments on this topic are composed in a
             overbearing manner.  Furthermore, while you and those
             you intend may understand your point of view, I do not
             and I suspect there are many others reading this conversation
             who don't either.  How long has it been since the last time
             this topic came up?  I've been following this conversation for
             about 4 months, and I've seen only one mention of the general
             topic "recoverable ram disks".

                
                                                        Happy New Year,

                                                                   Wade.


UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!haitex
ARPA: crash!pnet01!haitex@nosc.mil
INET: haitex@pnet01.CTS.COM