Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!necntc!dandelion!ulowell!page
From: page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: WSHell & Pipes (was Current Directory in Titlebar)
Message-ID: <2295@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Date: 29 Dec 87 20:38:33 GMT
References: <6359@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <2277@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu> <1327@sugar.UUCP>
Reply-To: page@swan.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Organization: University of Lowell, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 12

peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) wrote:
>Why would [WSHell] pipes require you to be running conman? PIPE: is
>a completely seperate device...

conman (the handler) is also a pipe handler.  Since that's what Bill's
most comfortable with, that's what he used.  You can still use PIPE:
for named pipes, of course.

..Bob
-- 
Bob Page, U of Lowell CS Dept.  page@ulowell.edu  ulowell!page
"I've never liked reality all that much, but I haven't found a
better solution."		--Dave Haynie, Commodore-Amiga