Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st:6502 comp.sys.amiga:11890 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!jack!crash!pnet01!haitex From: haitex@pnet01.cts.com (Wade Bickel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Multi-tasking? A nightmare... Message-ID: <2177@crash.cts.com> Date: 21 Dec 87 11:37:31 GMT Sender: news@crash.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon, CA Lines: 64 davidli@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu (Dave Meile) writes: > >The "average user" would be satisfied with a desk accessory, while the >"power user" will want multi-tasking. The "power user" will ALWAYS want >as much as possible in the machine being used. (Which is why I think >the "power user" should own a Sun or Apollo or VAX workstation and >forget the piddling PC market). > >Now, for the "Why I don't want a multi-tasking system". (Of course, I have >access to HUGE multi-user, multi-tasking systems at work...) > >I find that I get to do many little things around the house while I'm in >a terminal session. I can catch up on my reading, prepare dinner, change >record albums, everything except un-ARC files I'm downloading (which is >about the only thing I'd do if I owned a multi-tasking system). > >If I absolutely have to locate a file, I use the capabilities of my terminal >program's file selector to locate the thing and then go on doing whatever >I have to do. Of course, I can also use the CLI desk accessory that I have >up and running, too. > >Face it, most of us are (for the most part) linear beings. For single, >home systems multi-tasking is a less than useful for what we bought a >computer for ... writing information down, filing that information, >retrieving the information and playing games. :-) > >-- Dave Meile > >(yes, I know I'm cross-posting this ... some of my best friends own > Amigas, Macintoshes, IBM machines and Atari STs. They are all less > powerful than the VAXstation 2000 sitting on my desk at work.) An example of the value of Multi-tasking: It took me 4 tries to log on to the local network I use to access UseNet. In beteen attempts I was alternating between periods of work on a program I am writing and a document which goes with it. I am running Benchmark Modula-2's EMACs editor, and it is loaded with 9 different buffered files. I am also running "ProWrite" which is loaded with my document files (only 1 right now). And of course, I am running Diga, which is the terminal package I am using to connect to the net with. Were I to be denied Multi-tasking, I would be facing re- loading all the files which are sitting in memory right now! It would be nice to use a WP to create responses to the postings, unfortunatly the local net would log me off too quickly. I have a multi-tasking machine on my desk too! It's called an "Amiga". Why complain. I figure Muti-Tasking with the Amiga vs. no Multi-Tasking with the Atari-ST is like whether or not to accept a raise from your boss vs. turning it down. Merry Christmas, Wade. UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!haitex ARPA: crash!pnet01!haitex@nosc.mil INET: haitex@pnet01.CTS.COM