Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st:6543 comp.sys.amiga:11973
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ames!hao!oddjob!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!davidli
From: davidli@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu (Dave Meile)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Multi-tasking? A nightmare...
Message-ID: <3279@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu>
Date: 22 Dec 87 16:55:43 GMT
References: <2027@bath63.ux63.bath.ac.uk> <22237@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <8155@prls.UUCP> <7909@e.ms.uky.edu>
Reply-To: davidli@umn-cs.UUCP (Dave Meile)
Organization: University of Minnesota
Lines: 11
Summary: at last ..

In article <7909@e.ms.uky.edu> david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) writes:
>
>to be killed.  Oh, and I don't know for certain if Amiga can
>do what I just said -- my 2000 hasn't arrived yet :-).  But
>my CoCoIII with OS-9 could do exactly that.  (and I did exactly

Of course, you can get OS-9 (and IDRIS) for the Atari ST.  So there.  You
can multi-task to your hearts content, regardless of the machine.  BUT I
still insist that, for the non "power user" there's no need for it.

-- Dave Meile