Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!sunybcs!kitty!bakerst!kathy
From: kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Query about the quality of UNIX/PCs and 3b1's
Message-ID: <1004@bakerst.UUCP>
Date: 14 Dec 87 18:46:57 GMT
References: <9691@shemp.UCLA.EDU> <18017@clyde.ATT.COM> <997@bakerst.UUCP> <633@umbc3.UMD.EDU>
Reply-To: kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent)
Distribution: na
Organization: /etc/organization
Lines: 22

In article <633@umbc3.UMD.EDU> alex@umbc3.UMD.EDU (Alex S. Crain) writes:
} In article <997@bakerst.UUCP> kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent) writes:
} >In article <18017@clyde.ATT.COM> rcj@moss.UUCP (Curtis Jackson) writes:
} >>In article <9691@shemp.UCLA.EDU> coleman@CS.UCLA.EDU () writes:
} >>}o How standard is the UNIX they run?
} >>
} >>SVR3 (essentially); they follow the System V standards quite well from
} >>what I've seen.
} >
} >I believe that, if you check again, you'll find that the UNIX pc
} >does not, in fact, run SVR3.  It doesn't run real SVR2, either. 
} 
} 	would you care to elaborate on this? Version 3.51 (as opposed to
} RELEASE 3) is supposed to pass SVVD for Sys5r2, and some of the optional
                                  |
                                SVID

See Carol Furchner's followup to my posting.  I stand mostly
corrected - about the SVR*2* part. 

Kathy Vincent ------>  {ihnp4|mtune|codas|ptsfa}!bakerst!kathy
              ------>  { favourite AT&T gateway }!wruxe!unix