Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:1926 news.groups:2071
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!muscat!tsc..DEC.COM!pete
From: pete@tsc.DEC.COM (Pete Schmitt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,news.groups
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att
Message-ID: <266@tsc.DEC.COM>
Date: 30 Dec 87 16:03:26 GMT
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP>
Organization: DEC CSC/NSU in Colorado Springs
Lines: 15
Summary: No don't do it...

In article <167@mcmi.UUCP>, denny@mcmi.UUCP (Dennis Page) writes:
> 
> Isn't it about time that comp.sys.att spawned comp.sys.att.3b1?
> 
The traffic on this group doesn't warrent splitting it, plus there
are also discussions about 6300s, 6300+s, 6386s.  Should they be
split off too? No, of course not.  If you don't want to read an article
about a 3b1 press 'n'.


-- 
            \\\!///		From: Pete Schmitt
             _   _ 		UUCP: ihnp4!tsc!pete
           ( Q   Q )		It's okay to say the U... word.
 ---,,,,-------U-------,,,,---