Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:1941 news.groups:2089
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!super.upenn.edu!eecae!upba!unocss!hdr!mcmi!denny
From: denny@mcmi.UUCP (Dennis Page)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,news.groups
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att
Message-ID: <170@mcmi.UUCP>
Date: 31 Dec 87 18:04:27 GMT
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP> <266@tsc.DEC.COM>
Reply-To: denny@mcmi.UUCP (Dennis Page)
Organization: Medical Computer Management, Omaha, NE
Lines: 24

In article <266@tsc.DEC.COM> pete@tsc.DEC.COM (Pete Schmitt) writes:
>The traffic on this group doesn't warrent splitting it, plus there
>are also discussions about 6300s, 6300+s, 6386s.  Should they be
>split off too? No, of course not.  If you don't want to read an article
>about a 3b1 press 'n'.

Unfortunately, it often takes time to determine just what the article
is actually about.

As to the 6386s, I would include them in the business/development
category.  I think that this would be obvious.  If nothing else,
they cost too much to really be considered personal computers.

Much of the discussion reguarding the 3b1 revolves around items only
of concern to 3b1 users: How do I get rid of the window manager?;
How many power supplies have you replaced?; Here is a wonderful new
dialer for the builtin modem!; How can I change the control and caps
lock key around?...  These discussions have no relevance to the other
machines whatsoever.

-- 
Denny Page

Martha, the Clones are loose again!