Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!braegen!bwo
From: bwo@braegen.UUCP (Brian W. Oliver)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att
Message-ID: <134@braegen.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 88 17:23:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: braegen.134
Posted: Fri Jan  1 12:23:21 1988
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP> <16915@gatech.edu>
Organization: The Braegen Group Inc., Toronto Ontario CAN
Lines: 25

> In article <167@mcmi.UUCP> you write:
> >Isn't it about time that comp.sys.att spawned comp.sys.att.3b1?
> >The idea being to separate discussions of the 3b1/7300 machines (which
> >are much more oriented toward personal computer use), from those of the
> >3b2s, 3b5s, etc. (oriented toward business/development use).
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^ (spelling is correct)
> Au contraire (sp?). I support several 7300s and 3b2s in our microprocessor
> design lab. The 7300s make excellent development stations for doing 68000
> related stuff. Our main student workload is carried by the 3b2s. BTW, I also
> use an AT&T PC 6300 at home so, I get a lot out of this newsgroup :-).
> 
> 						Jim Greenlee
I too have an interest in all three AT&T hardware classes: 63xx, 7300/3B1
and 3B2/3B5 etc, but see the advantages in three distinct newsgroups:
  [1] those only interested in one category are not inundated
  [2] those interested in more than one can subscribe to whichever they
      want, and the articles will arrive in an *organized* fashion.

Brian Oliver
The Braegen Group                 Transit umbra, lux permanet.
Toronto
-- 
			Brian Oliver
		The Braegen Group, Toronto, Ontario
	{allegra,linus,ihnp4,decvax}!utzoo!yetti!utrc-2at!braegen!bwo