Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:1943 news.groups:2090
Path: utzoo!mnetor!spectrix!lsuc!ncrcan!ontenv!norm
From: norm@ontenv.UUCP (Norman Soley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,news.groups
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att
Message-ID: <344@ontenv.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 88 17:33:58 GMT
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP> <1870@netsys.UUCP>
Organization: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto
Lines: 13


I think it's a good idea. However I would suggest that instead of
doing the naming based on specific product names (3b1, 6300, 3b2...) 
That some sort of generic specification of the classifications be
used. Say based on some fundemental architectural difference between
the two major families. I don't know enough about the machines to
suggest possabilities, someone else will have to.

-- 
Norman Soley - Data Communications Analyst - Ontario Ministry of the Environment
UUCP:	utzoo!lsuc!ncrcan!---\			VOICE:	+1 416 323 2623
	{utzoo,utgpu}!sickkids!ontenv!norm	ENVOY:	N.SOLEY
	{mnetor,utgpu}!ontmoh/