Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:1947 news.groups:2099
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!islenet!richard
From: richard@islenet.UUCP (Richard Foulk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,news.groups
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att (need new group for 6300 only)
Message-ID: <3731@islenet.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 88 16:54:30 GMT
References: <167@mcmi.UUCP> <1870@netsys.UUCP> <2861@ncsugn.ncsu.edu>
Reply-To: richard@islenet.UUCP (Richard Foulk)
Organization: Islenet Inc.,  Honolulu
Lines: 18

> I have taken stuff from unix-pc.sources and ported it to the 3B2, and I
> have used 7300 material in comp.sys.att for the 3B2 -- I see very little
> reason to make the split.  Splitting off the ibm clones on the other
> hand ...
> 

I've been following this discussion and feeling it didn't really
matter either way.  But just creating a separate group for the 6300's
sounds like a GREAT idea.

Happy New Year!


Richard Foulk		...{dual,vortex,ihnp4}!islenet!richard
Honolulu, Hawaii