Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tikal!hplsla!hpubvwa!occrsh!rjd
From: rjd@occrsh
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Dividing comp.sys.att (need new group for 6300 only)
Message-ID: <144800007@occrsh>
Date: 4 Jan 88 03:03:00 GMT
References: <3731@islenet>
Lines: 17


>Rather than create another group related to micros, I think
>it might be a better idea to create a 'comp.sys.att.3b' group
>for 3b2/5/15/20 users.  Then they can cross post to comp.sys.att
>if they so feel.  I don't think there'd be any huge amount of 
>traffic on it though.  Personally, I like to read about everything
>that AT&T sells because we have just about everything here.
>
>Frank McGee

  I was one of those that was in support of the comp.sys.att.3b1 or pc
or whatever, but this idea sounds better.  Lets go for comp.sys.att.3b,
too bad probably none of them are going to work as the 14th character
is the "3" (max of 14 characters in the name, right?).  How about
comp.sys.att3b?

Randy