Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!221.162.fido!Usenet_area_"Cs.I.Pc"
From: 221.162.fido!Usenet_area_"Cs.I.Pc"@watmath.waterloo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: XENIX VS Micoport
Message-ID: <16217@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Date: 8 Jan 88 03:33:13 GMT
Sender: ugate@watmath.waterloo.edu
Lines: 32

From Usenet: gargoyle!ddsw1!igloo!learn
From: learn@igloo.UUCP (william vajk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: XENIX VS Micoport
Summary: right now....
Keywords: Which to buy??
Message-ID: <352@igloo.UUCP>
Date: 6 Jan 88 20:48:32 GMT
References: <252@fedeva.UUCP>
Organization: igloo, Northbrook, IL
Lines: 17

In article <252@fedeva.UUCP>, jbr0871@fedeva.UUCP (Blaine Robertson) writes:
> Our group will soon need to purchase one of these two products.  We have
> no experience in either of these items.  Any recommendations or comments
> would be appreciated.
> 

At the moment, there is no question that uport does not work correctly.
There is a promise of a newly fixed kernel ( post rev 2.3 ). The promise
will have to be proven. If you need a product immediately, go to xenix.

If you can hold off a bit, maybe *this time* uport has fixed it. I sure
hope so....




Bill Vajk                                              learn@igloo

--- via UGate v1.6
 * Origin: watmath (221/163)