Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!uwmcsd1!dogie!uwvax!geowhiz!uwspan!plocher
From: plocher@uwspan.UUCP (John Plocher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Mach 20 & Microport or SCO Xenix??
Message-ID: <561@uwspan.UUCP>
Date: 30 Dec 87 21:27:02 GMT
References: <1356@uhccux.UUCP>
Reply-To: todd@uhccux.UUCP (The Perplexed Wiz)
Followup-To: comp.unix.microport
Organization: U of Wisconsin - Madison  Spanish Department
Lines: 26
Approved: plocher@uwspan.uucp

I'm just about ready to buy a Microsoft Mach 20 board (8MHz 80286 board
with floppy disk controller [which I really need due to lack of slots] and
a mouse interface) as a stopgap until I can afford to buy a 386 box (maybe
sometime in Summer 88).  Has anyone tried to run either Microport V/286 or
SCO Xenix on a Mach-20 equipped PC?  I have a very slow (80msec) 30M hard
disk on my PC, but I think I could live with that until I get a 386 box
with a fast hard disk.

Any information you could provide me will be appreciated...todd

-- 
Todd Ogasawara, U. of Hawaii Faculty Development Program
UUCP:		{ihnp4,uunet,ucbvax,dcdwest}!sdcsvax!nosc!uhccux!todd
ARPA:		uhccux!todd@nosc.MIL		BITNET: todd@uhccux
INTERNET:	todd@uhccux.UHCC.HAWAII.EDU

-- 
Send submissions to microport@uwspan with a Subject: line  containing one of:
   6300+, 386, 286, Bug, Source, Merge, "Send Buglist", or "Send Version"
    For info, mail to microport@uwspan with "Send Info" as the Subject:.
  (UUCP: ...!uwvax!uwspan!microport & ...!uwvax!uwspan!microport-request)