Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!rbj@icst-cmr.arpa From: rbj@icst-cmr.arpa (Root Boy Jim) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Restoring to a smaller fs? Message-ID: <11018@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: 28 Dec 87 23:15:25 GMT Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 42 In article <484@cos.COM> asp@COS.COM (Andrew S. Partan) writes: >... Guy Harris [mentioned] ... "restore" has a symbol table that it keeps >around in the file system it's working on; ... this symbol table can be >very big ... [but] there is no way to say "put that thing somewhere >else!". Ah, but there is such a way. I had to do it once; I know it works: At *least* one. First mount the file system to be restored: # mount /dev/hp3a /a # cd /a Now mount something with enough room for "restoresymtable": # mount /dev/hp4a /tmp Finally, make a symlink from ./restoresymtable to a file in that second file system: # ln -s /tmp/restoresymtable restoresymtable # restore rf ... In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7690) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris restore x creates *no* symbol table file. And no, I do not believe in incremental restores. I do restores into separate directorys and move the files. Deletions are easy enuf to do. Another thing you can do is start your restore with the verbose option, capturing the list of restored files. Suspend the restore when the file system starts to fill, and point compress at the list of files already restored. When space reappears, resume the restore. (Root Boy) Jim Cottrell National Bureau of Standards Flamer's Hotline: (301) 975-5688 Well, O.K. I'll compromise with my principles because of EXISTENTIAL DESPAIR!