Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:1254 comp.unix.wizards:5913
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!rutgers!clyde!burl!codas!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: SCO XENIX UUX/UUCP undocumented option
Message-ID: <139@ateng.UUCP>
Date: 30 Dec 87 15:49:26 GMT
References: <358@mpx1.UUCP> <169@conexch.UUCP>
Reply-To: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg)
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 16
Keywords: XENIX uucp uux undocumented option

In article <169@conexch.UUCP> root@conexch.UUCP (Larry Dighera) writes:
>
>Uucico, on the other hand, lacks some functionality.  It dosen't seem to
>support \d for delay in the L.sys send/expect sequence nor mutiple days/times
>in the time field.  It also fails to try calling out on another modem line
>if it is previously unsuccessful.  

Yes, but since \d, \r, \c, etc. are needed by Telebit users, SCO has a uucico
that supports these escapes.  Just ask for a uucico that works with Telebit.

BUT -- I'm not going to bother, since they'll be coming out with HDB UUCP
in 1Q 88 (according to my src's.)

-- 
Chip Salzenberg                 UUCP: "{codas,uunet}!ateng!chip" 
A T Engineering             My employer's opinions are a trade secret.
Chip's Observation:  "Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't."