Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:1259 news.groups:2086
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!wa3wbu!john
From: john@wa3wbu.UUCP (John Gayman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.unix.microport
Message-ID: <444@wa3wbu.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 88 02:53:21 GMT
References: <4826@well.UUCP> <2357@dasys1.UUCP> <1386@puff.cs.wisc.edu> <513@spdcc.COM>
Organization: WA3WBU, Marysville,PA
Lines: 23
Summary: comp.unix.microport needs to be unmoderated

In article <513@spdcc.COM>, dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) writes:
> I see no overwhelming reason to keep comp.unix.microport as "moderated"

    I couldn't agree more. I was looking forward to the informative
discussions and information exchange in comp.unix.microport that we know
and enjoy in the other comp.* groups. Microport UNIX has been growing 
drastically and has a line of discussion all it's own of late. If I'm
having a particular problem with a utility, it is hardly worth my time
to post it to comp.unix.microport and have it dissappear into the 
woodwork or be responded to 3 weeks later. I think most of the private
folks running Microport on their personal systems need to communicate with
each other on a fairly timely basis for all the benefiet. I personally
do not think having comp.unix.microport moderated is serving the best
interests of *US* the Microport users or the Net resources.

					John



-- 
John Gayman, WA3WBU              |           UUCP: uunet!wa3wbu!john
1869 Valley Rd.                  |           ARPA: wa3wbu!john@uunet.UU.NET 
Marysville, PA 17053             |           Packet: WA3WBU @ AK3P