Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-emx!mybest!paddock
From: paddock@mybest.UUCP (Steve Paddock)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: 2nd to last posting on Microsoft dropping Xenix
Message-ID: <61@mybest.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 88 05:55:59 GMT
References: <4826@well.UUCP> <2357@dasys1.UUCP> <1386@puff.cs.wisc.edu>
Reply-To: paddock@mybest.UUCP (pri=-0-Steve Paddock)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Best Printing Co., Austin, Tx.
Lines: 22
Keywords: Microport UNIX XENIX BBS BIX, End of discussion?

In article <1386@puff.cs.wisc.edu> plocher@uwspan.uucp (John Plocher) writes:
*
*As the moderator of Comp.unix.microport I need to say ONE thing:
*
*	I haven't seen any submissions from you!
*
*So, How do you defend the statement "an unnecessary inconvenience and a
*handicap for worthwhile user<->user discussion"?  You haven't even TRIED IT!
*
*Come on, give it a chance; make use of it.  If you aren't getting the group
*at your site, ask your sysadmin why not.  Above all, see how it works before
*you shoot it down in flames.
*
I think that there is a logical flaw.  Xenix doesn't seem to need moderation,
and microport does?  Why not net.microport :-)

Happy new year, unmoderate microport et al.

Steve
-- 
Steve Paddock (ut-emx!mybest!paddock) 512-477-9736
Best Printing Co,  Austin, Texas  78767