Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:1266 news.groups:2114
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brandx.rutgers.edu!webber
From: webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.unix.microport
Message-ID: <690@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Date: 3 Jan 88 05:36:07 GMT
References: <4826@well.UUCP> <2357@dasys1.UUCP> <1386@puff.cs.wisc.edu> <444@wa3wbu.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 13
Summary: so?

In article <444@wa3wbu.UUCP>, john@wa3wbu.UUCP (John Gayman) writes:
> In article <513@spdcc.COM>, dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) writes:
> > I see no overwhelming reason to keep comp.unix.microport as "moderated"
> 
>     I couldn't agree more. I was looking forward to the informative
> discussions and information exchange in comp.unix.microport that we know
> and enjoy in the other comp.* groups. ...

What you say is perfectly reasonable and could be said about most of
the moderated groups.  Do you expect moderators to just give up because
a few reasonable people think they are not needed or are you ready to 
collect votes for an unmoderated microport group?

--------- BOB (webber@athos.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!athos.rutgers.edu!webber)