Xref: utzoo soc.singles:12918 alt.flame:1303 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!pyramid!prls!philabs!ttidca!quad1!oleg From: oleg@quad1.quad.com (Oleg Kiselev) Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.flame Subject: Re: "the best women" Message-ID: <1429@quad1.quad.com> Date: 14 Jan 88 00:59:38 GMT References: <7728@sunybcs.UUCP> Reply-To: oleg@quad1.quad.com (Oleg Kiselev) Organization: HASA Lines: 81 Fai, if until now anyone had any reservations about you beint a twit, your article should have dispelled any doubts. In article <7728@sunybcs.UUCP> ugfailau@joey.UUCP (Fai Lau) writes: [About being able to out-flame me, but not wanting to] >Especially when there are some people who >have a penchant of siding Oleg. I guess I have friends on the NET, Fai. How unusual, huh? Pays to be a nice person sometimes... >This [i.e. my posting] is pretty laughable stuff. Obviously >Oleg has not seen a real insult. Name calling and >unimaginative usage of words are not the way to go. No, Fai. You got back-ass-wards. You have not been on the NET long enough to claim whether I had or had not seen "real" insults, and to judge whether I am capable of producing "quality" flames. I would not claim the mental agility of Rich Rosen or Matthew Weiner or Gene Ward Smith, the asinine poison of Ken Arndt or the sheer malodorousness of Bird Dog, but those who have been around for a while know that I CAN be nasty in my own, personal, inimitable way... Fai, sweety, my "flame" was a silly, polite and harmless joke. You don't want to have me FLAME you -- take my word for it. >I figure Oleg is not worth the >risk of having the system staff coming down on me again. (Giggle ;-) I just think this is incredibly funny. I write the most light-hearted flame of my entire NET existance and get back a 140 line mess of chest-pounding, ephemeral threats and unasked-for excuses.) >As far as this news group >is concerned, I post mostly only to raise a little hell. So you are trying to be an asshole and a dweeb just to try to have fun at our expence? What a shit. >Why does anyone think I said "flame me?" Because you wanted me to flame you, son. You could not get me to flame any of your sexist, macho, narrow-minded crap before, so you decided to make an offer I could not refuse. What else could it be?! > I don't know about you, Oleg. But I have had the _ABSOLUTE_ >best women around, whose beauty you can never even dream of. And I'm >not afraid to admit it that true blonds who are incredible gorgeous >seem to have a thing for me. I am an extremely popular man among >beautiful women, Oleg. It is just funny to read what you said about >me the way you did. Ooh, a SEX GOD! Hey, Fai! How would you know what I can and can not "even dream of"? For that matter, why should I care how "popular among beautiful women" you are? Do you expect me to start parading my "conquests" in return and turn this into a "I get fucked by better cunts!" bragging? FORGET IT, Fai! My ego does not need that boost. > My recent posting on C has been silently accepted by the net, Bullshit. Your condescending posting in comp.lang.c drew a number of outraged (but polite) denouncements. > Oh, BTW, I don't even remember when was the last time >I *chased* a woman. They always come to me. Always. Ooh, a REAL(tm) SEX GOD! With a REAL(tm) SEX APPEAL! I am awed! >Also, don't forget: beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. That's right, Fai. And from this end you are an unpleasant pissant fouling up the otherwise friendly news group. I guess that means "offensive and ugly", huh? -- Oleg Kiselev -- oleg@quad1.quad.com -- {...!psivax|seismo!gould}!quad1!oleg HASA, "A" Division DISCLAIMER: I don't speak for my employers.