Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdahl!ihnp4!ihlpg!apeed
From: apeed@ihlpg.ATT.COM (Andrew B. Peed)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Wimps on the net
Message-ID: <4641@ihlpg.ATT.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 88 23:04:59 GMT
References: <22604@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
Lines: 31

> I recently was flamed by nasty ol' Andrew B Peed, and then nasty ol' me
> flamed him back a few times, just to make sure.
> 
> We received the following e-mail from someone I will not name:
> 
> |I think you both really need to mellow out a bit.
> 
> I told our mutual friend that this newsgroup was alt.flame.
> 

   WAIT A MINNIT, DAMMIT!! Our mailer here at ihlpg must be messed up, 'cause
I did'nt get no e-mail from someone you will not name.
 
   What I DID get was weemba's reply, which means you must have responded from
within your mail-reading program, since I was included on the Cc: line or
equivalent thereof. I then sent weemba a note asking what this person whom he
will not name, and who I won't name either until I read the complete text of
his note and then only if I feel sufficiently provoked.

   I've yet to hear back from weeba.

   And, YOU, you person who shall not be named, if you ain't on no UUCP link
yer gonna have a truckload of problems getting mail to me, cause my friends at
dear old MTU (on BITNET) can't either.

Oh, gawd, I misused a comma in the above paragraph and in this sentence.
Crucify me.

(By the way, this entire posting is a blatant forgery. It IS coming to you from
 ihlpg!apeed, but Andy is out of our collective body right now. I'm minding the
 shop.)