Xref: utzoo talk.politics.misc:6815 misc.legal:3468 alt.flame:1471
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ncsuvx!gatech!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,misc.legal,alt.flame
Subject: Re: The lawsuit of the year! (politics and higher laws)
Keywords: conservative vs liberal, views, means
Message-ID: <1952@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jan 88 19:46:45 GMT
References: <2832@killer.UUCP> <1606@mind.UUCP> <11143@sri-spam.istc.sri.com> <11762@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <3017@killer.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Distribution: na
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 12

In article <3017@killer.UUCP> allen@sulaco.UUCP (Allen Gwinn) writes:
>Well,
>Valerie, I happened to have paid for some of that stuff with my tax money
>and don't agree with some idiot who wants to take the law into his own hands
>to destroy it without due process [what do you think about that :-)].

This is an important point.  Those who oppose the money being spent on
this issue should be permitted to file as objectors and get a refund of
that portion of their tax dollars that would be used for it.  The same
would apply to social security, etc.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!dhesi