Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!esosun!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!rjf
From: rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney)
Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng
Subject: Re: Offices versus Cubicles (LONG)
Message-ID: <4259@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Jan 88 10:23:14 GMT
References: <2058@pdn.UUCP> <82@sickkids.UUCP> <1988Jan25.133520.904@mntgfx.mentor.com>
Reply-To: rjf@ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Lines: 13
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:

In article <1988Jan25.133520.904@mntgfx.mentor.com> tomc@mntgfx.mentor.com (Tom Carstensen) writes:
>[..]
>I CAN NOT STAND the florescent light used in large rooms, and 
>much prefer the privacy of having your own office. 
>(I always just use the lamps in my office).

I recently heard of some British work which indicated that people spending
long hours (ie working) under conventional florescent lights experienced
significantly more minor ailments such as headaches than those under new
flicker-free lighting. Does anyone have any OBJECTIVE information (like a
reference) on this?

Robin Faichney