Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!killer!elg From: elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green) Newsgroups: comp.edu Subject: Re: Ph.D.'s and Teaching Message-ID: <2970@killer.UUCP> Date: 18 Jan 88 04:02:33 GMT References: <136@mccc.UUCP> Organization: Bayou Telecommunications Lines: 50 [Re: Chemistry teacher in secondary schools should be a Chemistry major with a couple of education courses, not an Education major with a couple of Chemistry courses:] in article <136@mccc.UUCP>, pjh@mccc.UUCP (Peter J. Holsberg) says: > Noo Joisey has recently enacted legislature/created policy that allows > school boards to hire people with subject matter expertise but no teacher > training, based apparently on thoughts similar to yours! Louisiana also recently passed a similiar law (about time -- the only school system worse than that of Louisiana is Mississippi). It requires the person to take 9 hours of Education classes during the summer. One problem, however, is that very few schools can support more than one or two sections of Chemistry, at least, not Louisiana public schools or "fundamentalist" academies (which are mostly Bible-study groups :-(. Around here, the only schools that could possibly feed and clothe a full-time Chemistry teacher are the more prestigious parochial schools of the "established" religions (note that Louisiana has never had a tradition of prestigious private academies such as some Northern states have... that niche has always been filled here by parochial schools, especially the Catholic ones, since over 50% of the state's population is Catholic). Of the two public high schools that I attended, both of which had about 1400 students, both had trouble filling a single section of Physics, and both only had a couple of sections apiece of Biology and Chemistry. It's interesting to note that in the parochial school I attended for a couple of years, they DID have both a full-time Physics teacher and a full-time Chemistry teacher -- but then, Chemistry and Physics were both required, at that school. Things might have improved a bit since then, especially with recent Louisiana laws requiring two sections of science in order to graduate. But still, I doubt it (probably all that the Louisiana laws accomplished was the dilution of science and mathematics courses to the point where any semi-vegetative potato-brain could pass them, especially with the shortage of mathematics and science teachers -- thus the justification for the recent law to allow math and science majors to teach high school with just a summer's worth of education courses). It is still quite probable that in the majority of the U.S., students are still not required to take science and mathematics courses in order to graduate (or, at least, not beyond "Consumer Math" and "Home Economics"). Until we put those kids in class, it gets very hard to economically justify paying a person full-time wages to work 2 hours a day (and do you REALLY think that someone with a BS in Chemistry can afford to work part-time?). -- Eric Lee Green elg@usl.CSNET Asimov Cocktail,n., A verbal bomb {cbosgd,ihnp4}!killer!elg detonated by the mention of any Snail Mail P.O. Box 92191 subject, resulting in an explosion Lafayette, LA 70509 of at least 5,000 words.