Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 From: nevin1@ihlpf.ATT.COM (00704A-Liber) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Possible extension to C?? Summary: Public retraction Message-ID: <3329@ihlpf.ATT.COM> Date: 11 Jan 88 23:03:54 GMT References: <3306@ihlpf.ATT.COM> <7602@alice.UUCP> <495@auvax.UUCP> Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpf.UUCP (00704A-Liber,N.) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 16 In article <3306@ihlpf.ATT.COM>, I write: > I feel that *0 should be equal to 0 (at least for the data types char, short, > int, long and 'pointer'). While driving home, I realized that this probably wouldn't even work on my XT clone, let alone other systems. (I haven't had to program in assembler for a LONG time; I forgot that interrupts and bootstraps are sometimes found in low memory.) Sorry to waste the bandwidth, and thanks to all the people who responded with messages and e-mail. Embarassed, -- _ __ NEVIN J. LIBER ..!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 (312) 510-6194 ' ) ) "The secret compartment of my ring I fill / / _ , __o ____ with an Underdog super-energy pill." / (_