Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!nscpdc!djg
From: djg@nscpdc.NSC.COM (Derek J. Godfrey)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "logical" xor
Summary: logical XOR Algol 68
Message-ID: <961@nscpdc.NSC.COM>
Date: 14 Jan 88 16:33:32 GMT
References: <11207@brl-adm.ARPA> <20153@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> <7046@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Organization: National Semiconductor, Portland Development Center, Portland, OR
Lines: 9

In article <7046@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
> 
> By the way, I don't think a logical XOR is important enough to bother
> adding to C.  It should be in the next conventional language you
> design, however (Ada++?).

logical XOR (or logical equivalence) has always been part of Algol 68.
So much for adding a new feature to a new language
 ..