Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!yale!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: New operators
Message-ID: <7062@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 13 Jan 88 05:33:47 GMT
References: <11225@brl-adm.ARPA>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <11225@brl-adm.ARPA> dsill@NSWC-OAS.arpa (Dave Sill) writes:
>Suffer through pow(x,y) notation, it's not *that* bad.

True, but having the operation done by log & exp with doubles when
much more efficient methods could have been used, *is* bad.

>Besides, there are real problems with defining new operators,

That's for sure.  There aren't many symbols left!